News 
 Australian Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Biofuels back in vogue 

Biofuels back in vogue

15 Feb, 2010 02:33 PM
THEY’RE back - after being flavour of the month in the middle years of the decade, renewable fuels were knocked out of the water over the past three years, and consigned to the scrap-heap by many.

A combination of rising grain prices, falling oil prices and ambivalence on the behalf of governments across the world after reports that grain-based biofuels were contributing to world hunger meant that the ethanol and bio-diesel sectors contracted markedly, with planned developments withering on the vine in Australia and production slowing through other countries, including the US, in spite of its strong ethanol mandate.

However, the pendulum is swinging back, with rising oil prices and falling grain values bringing biofuels back into the picture as a viable economic option.

Executive director of Renewable Fuels Australia Bob Gordon believed the same fundamentals that led to the massive interest in biofuels earlier in the decade remained a strong driver and had combined with the more favourable market conditions to put biofuels under the microscope again.

He said there had been enough progress in economically creating ethanol from cellulose to ensure grain ethanol would continue to be used in the interim as a ‘transition fuel’ as the world neared peak oil production.

The strong American push continued to have a big influence on the biofuel industry, Mr Gordon said.

“The critical factor is that they are pushing ethanol very hard as part of their oil dependency strategy, (Barack) Obama has reinforced that since he has been in power.

“They are encouraging more investment and moving forward more quickly with cellulose technology.”

He said the underlying issue of meeting world energy needs faced with dwindling oil supplies remained.

“It won’t be just ethanol or biodiesel, but gaseous fuels as well, their big role will be as key transition fuels once we reach peak oil, and I think its going to be important that Australia has the infrastructure there to use alternative fuels.”

The change towards more favourable market conditions for ethanol was highlighted by Pacific Seeds’ sorghum and bioenergy global manager Scott Gibson.

“Grains such as corn were being bought for top dollar when the drop in oil prices occurred, which made biofuel operations very difficult. With corn prices back to around $4 and oil prices up to $80 per barrel, it becomes profitable again,” Mr Gibson said.

He said the Australian grains and sugar industries would benefit from having an alternative market competing for product.

Mr Gibson used the example of Brazil, where farmers were making more money out of their sugar cane producing sugar rather than ethanol, but still supported bioenergy production for the extra security it offered.

“Farmers would like to see a greater number of outlets for their produce and that is what bioenergy can provide for the producer.”

He said that the three ethanol manufacturing facilities in Australia – located at Sarina, Sydney and Dalby – which ferment their ethanol from sugar, grains, and sorghum respectively could ramp up production to 350 megalitres of ethanol by 2012 if high crop quality can be maintained.

Mr Gordon said he saw a mixture of focus on traditional grain ethanol, biodiesel and new technologies such as cellulosic ethanol, which will can use cellulose from by-products such as crop residue or wood chips.

However, he said it was important while work continued on new technologies to continue to keep up with traditional grain-based ethanol.

For ethanol’s revival, he said complimentary businesses such as feedlots were still needed to make use of the by-product of making grain-based ethanol.

“Out of the grain used to make ethanol, some 35pc goes back into the food chain in the form of feedlots as a higher protein feed stock.”

Mr Gibson said work was continuing on sorghum varieties bred specifically for energy production.

“Pacific Seeds are utilising three breeding programs in Australia, the United States and Argentina in order to get high yields, high starch levels, high digestibility and good hybrid vigour.”

“Advances in sweet sorghum and energy sorghum as a feedstock for bioethanol production is a very high priority.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It still bothers me that grain is being used to fuel some yuppies car in the city when 100% of the same grain could have been a food. If you look at the current biodiesel feed stocks we have a similar situation. A recent innovation is growing diesel trees on non-cropping ground in coastal Queensland. A hectare of these trees is capable of producing around 10,000 litres of biodiesel per year at maturity (around 15 years), enough to run a small farm and the trees will still be producing for your grandchildren. The oil from these trees can be used directly in a diesel engine without any treatment other than filtering. If anyone is interested, I can get the email of the bloke that grows them for you and post it if he agrees.
Posted by Trugger, 15/02/2010 9:42:45 PM
If ethanol production can bring more stability to grain prices grain production will increase. This will bring greater security to food supplies. The market should set the price of grain and if the community believes that we should subsidise food prices for the worlds poor then the community should pay, not the producer. Sustainable energy production is more about peak oil then Co2. Peak oil will devastate food production unless we developed renewable alternatives. Yes we should be moving developing production from other sources such as cellulose & algae.
Posted by Bill, 16/02/2010 10:12:47 AM
What contradictions we are experiencing - on the one hand we have the potential to grow masses of grain for both fuel and food while we are being refused permission to clear scrubby rubbish that is virtually useless. If the world wants enough food then the way to get it is to encourage farming - not discourage or worse still outlaw it with such laws as the Native Vegetation Act.
Posted by daw, 16/02/2010 3:37:00 PM
It would be interesting to see australians eating sorgum grain. It is difficult to get any more than $150 a tonn for it. Anybody want a few thousand tonns? Makes good alcahol!
Posted by peter, 17/02/2010 10:41:04 AM
I want to clarify something to all the silly folks out there that believe the corn we turn into ethanol is food for human consumption. It is NOT!! The corn that is taken to an ethanol plant is corn that could only be consumed by livestock. And don't tell me then that the price of meat is going up because I am a livestock producer and the price I receive has gone down for 3 years now. Corn ethanol is without a doubt one of the best investments this country has ever made. It has saved taxpayers billions and billions in farm subsidies. It has made it possible for the oil companies to stop using MTBE, which is a cancer causing, poisonous oxygenate that has been leaching into our drinking water for years, to help gas burn fully. People like to say ethanol is subsidized, not true, that .45 cent subsidy people like to refer to goes into the pockets of the oil companies, it's called a blenders credit. Oil companies don't like buying their competitors fuel to blend in with theirs so the govt gives them .45 cents as an incentive. The govt receives back an almost 10 to 1 return on their investment thru taxes and such. Ethanol is good for this country even though most don't know why.
Posted by Davo, 23/02/2010 3:09:10 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 February, 2010
11 February, 2010
POLL
Q: Have your voting intentions changed since Tony Abbott became leader of the federal Opposition?

Yes - more likely to vote Coalition
(32.2%)

Yes - more likely to vote Labor
(9%)

Yes - more likely to vote for a minor party
(5.7%)

No change - still a Coalition voter
(42.5%)

No change - still a Labor voter
(5.5%)

No change - still a minor party voter
(5.1%)

Total Votes: 870
Poll Date: 14 February, 2010



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...