News 
 Australian Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Coles points finger 

Coles points finger

26 Feb, 2011 05:00 AM
PRICE war protagonist, Coles, is trying to deflect some of the intense scrutiny and criticism of its massive milk discounting campaign onto the publicity-shy milk processing sector.

It says milk companies should be more transparent about how they set farm gate payments and should be contributing more to the heated $1 a litre price debate.

In particular, the supermarket giant is pointing the finger at overseas-owned Parmalat and National Foods, suggesting they could be more "up front" about the calculation strategies they use to value milk the buy from farmers.

Farmers and numerous other critics of Coles' discounting offensive say the retailer is undermining the entire fresh milk supply chain's sustainability by selling milk at a loss, with farmgate prices, branded milk sales, smaller retailers and distributors all being squeezed.

Fighting accusations of blatant predatory and anti-competitive behaviour, Coles Supermarkets managing director, Ian McLeod, this week stepped up the retailer's efforts to win support from dairy farmers and consumers, insisting it was "not out to hurt dairy farmers" by cutting milk prices.

Mr McLeod said by cutting food inflation to deflation, Coles was saving Australian families' grocery bills about $1 billion a year.

Coles spokesman, Jim Cooper, said the company had done its best to reassure farmers it was absorbing the full cost of the four to 33 per cent discounts to its house brand milk lines and had also begun paying, National Foods, a higher price for the Coles generic milk contract just weeks before slashing its store prices.

"We don't deal direct with farmers to buy our milk, but we have a lot of empathy with them. We think there's an element of this debate that is being overlooked," Mr Cooper said.

He said if Coles' use of just five per cent of all milk produced in Australia was supposedly directly threatening the viability of processors (and therefore farmers), the milk companies should be explaining themselves and showing how their earnings retention figures were under pressure.

While "others" claimed the explosion in generic milk sales undermined branded milk sold under processors' own labels such as Dairy Farmers, Pura or Pauls, and stripped away their profit margins, he said it was interesting that "not a lot" was being said on the topic by National or Parmalat.

National Foods, part of the Japanese beverage giant Kirin Group, has limited its comments about the impact of the supermarket milk price war to saying the "dramatic pricing change was a complex issue that would clearly affect the white milk category".

National has also confirmed new farmgate milk contract talks with 1820 of its farmer suppliers for the 2011-12 year failed reach agreement before last month's deadline, but said negotiations had no relation to the Coles milk price issue.

"We are in gentlemanly conversations with the Dairy Farmers Milk Co-operative (DFMC) and believe we will come to an agreement in March," a company statement said.

Queensland Dairyfarmers Organisation chief executive officer, Adrian Peake, said it was no surprise processors were minimising their comments about the contentious generic milk price.

"Processors are in a pretty awkward position. They're squeezed by the price competition between supermarkets, but they also must remain on good terms with the retailers who buy their product because these supermarkets have so much power," Mr Peake said.

"There's no doubt processors are losing milk market share for their proprietary brands - Australian generic milk sales have grown from 25 to 50pc in the past decade.

"After upsetting all the stakeholders in the dairy industry, Coles now seems to be feeling the heat and wants to divert the blame to processors," Mr Peake said.

"I only hope they're getting the message, because the public comments they've made are either wrong or just not the truth.

"If you really want to see where Ian McLeod and his English cricket team are taking Coles' cut-throat campaign, look at the UK where house brand milk has taken over - you need a search party to find a bottle of branded milk in a British supermarket."

Mr Peake said branded milk sales not only provided the profits processors needed to stay in business, but since Coles slashed house brand prices a month ago the impact on branded purchases had directly hit Parmalat suppliers with contracts were tied to daily sales of Pauls' fresh milk.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Time to man up and grow a set Coles. Cop it sweet. At the moment you're like the idiot who starts a fire with a angle grinder and claims they didnt hear the warnings.

Stop pointing fingers saying its everybody else i did nothing.

Posted by THE FARMER, 26/02/2011 6:58:07 PM
So FARMER, you honestly think the processors own brands are not over-priced? Even before the discount I was only every buying house brand milk - never the "brands". They are using a gimik to try to get more people into their supermarkets to also purchse other products. Lose 40 cents on milk, make $5 on other things. Good maths.

And logically, it is not in Coles interest for any industry to become concentrated. That gives the seller more power to deal with Coles. yes, Coles (and the processors) look after their own wallets, but not as simple as saying "selling cheap is bad".

Posted by JayDin, 28/02/2011 10:00:59 AM
So JayDin thinks its OK for one of two major (oligopolistic) retailers to shaft thousands of family farmers for the sake of getting a few more punters through the door so they can then sell them impulse confectionary and bottled water on a higher margins?

Most urban punters wouldn't have the faintest hope of detecting the watered down milk that will eventually come from these sorts of predatory scum.

They can just take out the cream, add water and the right amount of transfats prior to the homogenisation process and the bimbosphere wouldn't have a clue.

And then they'll blame their kids obesity on the hamburgers.

Posted by Ian Mott, 28/02/2011 12:45:37 PM
I'm a farmer and I supply coles as a major supplier of horticultural products if it wasn't for them we would have gone to the wall a long time ago as far as I am concerned the milk thing can only sell more milk which has to put more pressure on supply which in turn should be good for the industry down the track. Don't bite the hands that feed you coles or farmer it gets you no where.
Posted by 67 model, 28/02/2011 1:39:08 PM
jaydin no i dont think branded milk was over priced.

If there was money to be made in milk coles/wesfarmers would be buying dairy farms and processing their own milk.

As there is no money to be made in vertical integration of milk they decided there is more money in losing money on milk.

Yes selling cheap is bad in the long term ..Look at lamb and mutton prices if you can afford to, what happened 4-6 years ago is coming home to roost.

If you cant look any further than your own personal greed you're a waste of time.

Posted by THE FARMER, 28/02/2011 2:35:44 PM
So Motley, there is something wrong with supplying 20 plus million Australian consumers (you are one of them, Motley, believe it or not) with a basic food staple at a lower price than previously available?

The basic needs of twenty million people (many with meagre incomes) are secondary to “thousands of family farmers” eh?

Instead of taking your plastic tank down to Coles and throwing buckets of sour milk over hard-working Coles employees, why don’t you lower yourself to walking down to the dairy cabinet and see the look of delight in the faces of the income-stressed consumers as they load up the bonus that is being made available to them?

Motley, you make your usual baseless outrageous claims, without the slightest whiff of evidence, and expect those same outrageous claims to be accepted as fact.

One (only one of many) problem you have, Motley, is that you have no intellectual control over your typing finger.

Another problem (still one of many) is that you have no brains to exercise afore-mentioned control.


Posted by Bushie Bill, 1/03/2011 10:42:42 AM
You've got it wrong, 67 model because you clearly do not operate at the very limits of your capacity the way Dairy farmers do.

There is no point supplying additional product if there is zero margin left.

The only way most dairy farmers can expand production is by way of additional inputs of variable costs like feed purchases.

And as the current price of milk does not cover those additional variable costs, the additional sales do not spread the overhead costs any better.

Furthermore, total demand for milk does not increase with lower prices. This price war is a strategy aimed at capturing market share from the smaller retailers who do not have the same market muscle as Coles.

And clearly, the long term consequences of this market concentration will be even further abuse of market power.

Posted by Ian Mott, 1/03/2011 1:13:06 PM
Motty, horray you & I are finally in full agreement on something.

I certainly don't have much margin left to squeeze.

I guess you knew that though. As a farmer fighting for action on AGW I could hardly have the brains to be successful.

BB, put away your economics bible & get some common sense. Screwing Aussie producers will end up leaving Australian consumers no option but to import many staples, leaving a much greater carbon footprint.

Posted by Cow Cocky, 1/03/2011 4:58:19 PM
Cow Cocky, you are not moving back to that totally discredited crap of food miles again, are you? I thought we gave it an appropriate funeral some time ago. It is "pie in the sky" gobbledegook which has absolutely no meaning or intellectual basis whatsoever, except for those who believe they have a god-given right to command what others must and must not do to earn a living and to spend their incomes. You speak for yourself and do whatever is necessary to salve your own conscience, and let the rest of us make up our own minds, if you don't mind. If I want to buy booze from Bosnia or a car from Korea, I will not be prevented by someone who tries to enforce their personal philosophies upon me, particularly if it results in a lowering of my standard of living. For the sake of completeness, imports do not automatically mean higher carbon footprints. Think about it (or go back and reread some of our previous posts on this furphy).
Posted by Bushie Bill, 1/03/2011 5:55:10 PM
B Bill buying booze from Bosnia might be a problem, that's a muslim country.

Serbia though could supply you with the cheapest known unto man rot gut your consumer heart demands . (if its cheap it must be better " B.B " )

That pie in the sky gobbledegook may become carbon miles rather then food miles.

Red Julia thinks she has the god given at the moment, a common fault in most of those in Canberra (burley griffin pedestrians ).

I am disappointed you have not tried to eviscerate my earlier post.

I look forward to your usual dose of verbose hyperbole.

Posted by THE FARMER, 2/03/2011 12:04:05 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...