News 
 Australian Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Dingo may have its day, again 

Dingo may have its day, again

14 Aug, 2009 06:00 AM
SCIENTISTS are calling for dingoes to be reintroduced into large areas of Australia to help prevent the further extinction of native mammals.

A University of Sydney researcher, Chris Dickman, said dingoes could protect small threatened species in arid and semi-arid areas from introduced predators, particularly red foxes and feral cats.

''Putting them back out there rather than poisoning them would be a fantastic way forward for conservation,'' said Professor Dickman, a finalist in this year's Australian Museum Eureka Prize for Environmental Research.

Dingoes could help increase biodiversity across more than 2 million square kilometres of the continent, he said.

A CSIRO researcher, Iain Gordon, said Australia had the worst mammal extinction record in the world, with 22 mammals having died out in the past 200 years.

Professor Gordon will chair a special symposium on solutions to this ''extinction crisis'', including dingo reintroduction, at next week's 10th International Congress of Ecology in Brisbane.

The proposal is still controversial, he said. ''There will be large swathes of people, particularly in rural Australia, who are not happy with having more dingoes around.''

A University of Western Sydney dingo researcher, Brad Purcell, said the animals were a ''keystone'' species for maintaining biodiversity.

Their successful reintroduction, however, would require changes to livestock management.

During the periods when the dingoes were most likely to approach cattle or sheep, farmers would need to put livestock into safer areas, hire shepherds, or use guard dogs or alpacas.

The savings from halting dingo baiting could offset the costs, he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It sounds a bit radical but the dingo did exist in Australia for thousands of years without causing mass extinctions. It wasn't until the cat and the fox arrived that the trouble really started.
Posted by Glen, 14/08/2009 1:12:25 PM
This is too radical. How is a dingo meant to out compete foxes and cats in order to protect native species, when they were out competed by them in the first place?

This is just another case of conservationist ideas passing the buck on to farmers, who were originally encouraged to remove predators of domestic animals. Shepherds cannot possibly have their wages offset by the saving made, without baiting. Besides foxes will still be around and they do need baiting.

Yet another policy brought about inexperianced and unknowlegeable city scientists and conservationists.

Posted by Brendan, 14/08/2009 2:52:22 PM
I was having a tough day until I read this. During the periods when the dingoes were most likely to approach cattle or sheep, farmers would need to put livestock into safer areas, hire shepherds, or use guard dogs or alpacas. Don't you just love it!
Posted by Qlander, 14/08/2009 3:54:49 PM
A nearby farmer has a team of fox terriers for his crop protection.

I do not like the idea of improving dingo population for farm purposes. I think these "bright ideas" come from townies who actually believe that dingoes are dear little things.

Posted by Ronda Herrmann, 14/08/2009 6:46:57 PM
Can we introduce dingos into Sydney's eastern suburbs - the poodle eating kind!
Posted by Doggone, 14/08/2009 7:47:03 PM
More gibberish from the loony green left. If they want to reintroduce dingos, fine, do it in their precious national parks where they belong. They come onto my land I'll blow them away same as foxes, rabbits pigs and any other vermin.
Posted by bill, 15/08/2009 10:46:23 AM
Scientists maybe right in calling for dingoes to be reintroduced across Australia to prevent further loss of native mammals. At a Sydney conference on the dingo convened by the Colong Foundation for Wilderness, the most common answer Government researchers gave to questions about the dingo's effect on native and non-native populations is we don't know. The billions of dollars spent in killing and restricting the range of the dingo over so many years may be hard to justify. There is to date no body of research to tell us. By removing the dingo it appears humans are destroying a balance in nature.
Posted by Kathleen, 15/08/2009 4:10:08 PM
Unfortunately, these so-called scientists are funded by you and me. Is there no end to this giberish?
Posted by Bob, 17/08/2009 8:43:02 AM
I agree with ronda, but I would also like to make the point that the reason that dingos were not so wide spread before was because they did not have the availability of water that pastoral properties now provide in the arid areas as well as the new types of prey ie.... calves, lambs etc. And where is the money going to come from to put our stock in "safer areas" and who will we employ (and how?) to look after these herds when it is increasingly harder to find employees in the rural areas. I am yet to see a dingo eating a feral cat or a fox but have seen them eat our native wildlife. The reintorduction of dingos would also require a complete removal of feral dogs from our landscape to ensure that cross-breeding does not occur otherwise we may as well introduce more feral animals. Perhaps the future of Australian agriculture with its ever reducing herd numbers should look toward breeding dingos... I am sure people would love a slice of dingo on their plate.
Posted by kylie, 17/08/2009 10:31:28 AM
That's right, get rid of the dingo and do nothing about feral cats, dogs and pigs - what a joke!
Posted by tigerdicky, 17/08/2009 10:44:59 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Do you believe the RSPCA's claim that live exports can be ended without significantly hurting the economy?

Yes
(16.4%)

No
(80.2%)

Undecided
(3.3%)

Total Votes: 602
Poll Date: 09 August, 2009



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...