News 
 Australian Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 It's all about the right nutrients in the right places 

It's all about the right nutrients in the right places

14 Aug, 2009 06:00 AM
THE right nutrients in the right place on a crop plant can be as effective as a fungicide, a New Zealand plant pathologist told a Riverlands conference this week.

The chief researcher for Omnia Primaxa, an Australian-owned group that is commercialising New Zealand research, Dr Adrian Spiers, has cast an electron microscope over the decades-old organics industry claim that healthier plants are less susceptible to pests and diseases—and found it true.

Although Dr Spiers distances himself from the organic sector and unscientific “snake oil” solutions, he says that after studying plant pathology for 35 years, and going inside the plant to see how disease attacks, he’s learned that a plant’s best defences are often its own.

“We’ve discovered the most cost effective way to increase production is to allow the plant to use its own defences,” Dr Spiers said.

“It’s been proven now that distressed plants emit chemical signals that open them up to pests.”

“Slugs tend to attack the distressed lettuces. Healthy plants give vibrant signal that makes the insects leave it alone.”

“More robust plants mean greater productivity.”

Dr Spiers has a background in fungicide research with major New Zealand research agencies, but said the more he learned the more he realised that nutrients alone can also stimulate some plant immunity to disease.

“The best of both worlds often seems to be certain formulations of nutrients accompanied by a small amount of fungicide,” he said. “If it’s with the right nutrients, you often only need a very small amount of fungicide to make a difference.”

Depending on the situation, different nutrients can elicit different immune responses from the plant.

For instance, Dr Spiers said, very low amounts of urea can alter the properties of water, so that its molecular structure changes and it moves differently through cell membranes.

But while it’s understood that certain responses occur, it’s often not understood why. “You could have an army of PhD students looking at this,” Dr Spiers said.

His own research is focused on identifying commercially viable “elicitors” that stimulate a response in the plant, effectively bridging the gap between nutrition and fungal control.

The trick is building formulations that not only stimulate the plant, but keep it productive while it fights disease.

“When you stimulate the plant, that costs energy, so you need to supply nutrients to make up that energy deficit while the plant is fighting disease,” Dr Spiers said.

“If you put an elicitor on but it’s costing the plant something to fight disease, and it can’t replace that energy, it’s not going to produce as much fruit or vegetation.”

The bottom line, he says, is a more “holistic” range of products, some of which rely on nutrients alone, some which combine nutrient and chemical, but all of which rely on activating the plant’s own defences and minimise the use of chemicals.

Dr Spiers develops products for Omnia Primaxa, and wouldn’t discuss the details of its formulations, but Rob Clarke of Omnia Specialities, the Australian owner of the group, said the principle had been established across about 1000 trials in a NZ$500,000 research project funded by NZ government agency HortResearch.

Dr Spiers was in Australia this week to address the annual Omnia Primaxa conference in South Australia’s Riverlands.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Farmers who have been using 'best practice' biologically oriented methods have found this to be true time and time again. This is nothing 'new', but it is great that more science is finally backing up what has been observed in the field by many many astute farmers and growers - not just those organically oriented.

Professor Phil Callahan found that insects just won't home in (with their antennae as radar) to healthy crops - but will act as nature's garbage collectors on sub-standard crops.

Farmers are then told to spray with fungicide or insecticide or miticide or whatever to pull the crop through, so we end up eating inferior food that is laced with toxic chemicals.

By remineralising impoverished/flogged soils, and focusing on innoculating soils with biology (through composts/compost teas as recommended by Dr Elaine Ingham), so that sequestered carbon can be cycled within the soil/atmosphere and properly feed plants, this is a massive win for farmers.

No longer will they be tied and shackled to the profit-driven chemical companies to pull their crops/animals through. Profit will instead remain in the farmers pockets, where it rightfully belongs.

Posted by brett sanders, 14/08/2009 4:20:11 PM
1000 trials for $500 000??? Cheap trials, reliable results???
Posted by suno, 14/08/2009 8:27:12 PM
At last a balanced debate promoting clean and green, as well as healthy plant production. This is the best option for sustainable and profitable horticulture and agronomy. We'll never feed the world if we deploy the snake oil approach. Over the years NZ plant research has been light years ahead of us and has focused on delivering high quality produce to distant markets. We should listen carefully to the Kiwis and see what we can glean from them. Why not pinch some more knowledge off them to help our plant production. It's worked in rugby - through taking their best coaches we've improved our crop of young players. In 1978 I visited the Phytotron (plant R&D) unit at Massey Uni and found them to be on the cutting edge of plant R&D and it seems they are still focused on producing high yielding, top quality produce with lower inputs. Makes sense to me and I'm not too proud to use the good ideas from across the ditch or anywhere if it will provide us with more healthy produce to sell to our demanding world. I also hope we will be able use the info that Dr Dean's has to win the Bledisloe back soon.
Posted by agribizman, 17/08/2009 12:47:50 PM
Having worked as an agronomist in both Aus and NZ there ain't that much difference in the approach of either group of farmers fertiliser wise, considering the majority both groups have been indoctrinated by the fert and chemical companies. The Kiwis, however, poor on heaps more fert. Once again modern science is reinventing the wheel. If any of these scientists had ever bothered to read the Albrecht papers they would find their findings were found nearly 100 years ago and with no spin off of a product to go and help it along. Perhaps Mother Nature did manage to get things right in the first place.
Posted by Richard Woolley, 17/08/2009 3:09:00 PM
What about WA's Doctor Underwood. For years the use of a mix of permanganate of potash and magnesium sulphate has proved effective in my garden to discourage insects, clear up sooty mould and other fungal problems and encourage healthy growth. The recipe is crude, into a saturated solution of magnesium sulphate add enough potash to turn the mixture deep pink. A friend used the idea on olive trees and found it as effective as I did on neglected citrus badly affected by sooty mould. It deters white fly and cabbage moths also. It does not appear to affect the bees. Best of all it is also a plant nutrient.
Posted by Jaycie, 17/08/2009 5:31:48 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Adrian Spiers. Photo: Denys Finney.
Adrian Spiers. Photo: Denys Finney.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 August, 2009
13 August, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe the RSPCA's claim that live exports can be ended without significantly hurting the economy?

Yes
(16.4%)

No
(80.2%)

Undecided
(3.3%)

Total Votes: 602
Poll Date: 09 August, 2009



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...