News 
 Australian Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Billions pledged in carbon compo 

Billions pledged in carbon compo

13 Apr, 2011 08:05 AM
THE federal government will fight back today against the scare campaign over a carbon price by promising that compensation payments will be permanent and that millions of low-income households will actually be better off.

In the strongest indication yet that compensation will be delivered as tax cuts and higher welfare payments, the Climate Change Minister, Greg Combet, will pledge that assisting pensioners and low- and middle-income households will be a priority.

Of the billions that will be raised by putting a price on carbon, more than half will be dedicated to compensating the less well-off for the impact on their power prices and cost of living in general, while the remainder will be used for assisting industry and covering other transitional costs.

In an address to the National Press Club, Mr Combet will put paid to a claim by the Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott, who has been warning that the price on carbon will be permanent but compensation measures will not.

''The tax will be permanent, the compensation will be temporary and that's why you can't trust the government on this point,'' Mr Abbott said recently.

But Mr Combet will say today the assistance will be permanent.

While the government is yet to announce what form the assistance will take, the Herald understands it will be passed on to low- and middle-income earners as a tax cut, and to others as pension increases or increases to payments such as the Family Tax Benefit.

These increases would become a permanent part of the welfare payments that are indexed annually.

Mr Combet's speech will also be an attempt to put the heat on the opposition, which has vowed that, if elected, it will scrap the carbon price and abolish the compensation. This means it will have to reduce pensions and increase taxes.

As with the compensation in the original Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, many low-income households will profit.

''Millions of households will be better off under the carbon price,'' Mr Combet will promise today.

While he will not announce any details, it is understood the numbers will be similar to the CPRS under which 89 per cent of low-income households - about 2.9 million homes - would have received assistance equal to 120 per cent or more of their cost of living increase.

Also under the old plans, about 60 per cent of middle-income households - about 2.4 million homes - would have been fully compensated for the cost of living increase, while 97 per cent of such households would receive some assistance.

It is almost certain, too, that petrol will be shielded from the scheme to ensure no net increase in the price of fuel.

It is hoped today's announcement will settle nerves among Labor MPs who feel the government is losing the argument over putting a price on carbon because it has yet to announce compensation details.

Treasury modelling made public over a week ago forecasts the cost of living under a $30 carbon price would rise by up to $860 a year, or about $16.60 a week.

Paying the compensation as tax cuts and pension increases is also a deliberate measure to dissociate the compensation from the price rises. If it were paid as subsidised energy bills, consumers would not receive the shock of a high power bill and be motivated to use less energy.

The full compensation package, as well as details of assistance for exposed industries, is not expected until about July.

Working with the Greens and independents, the government intends to start a scheme on July 1 next year, in which the price per tonne of carbon would be fixed for three to five years. This is in effect a carbon tax.

After that, the scheme would morph into an emissions trading scheme with the market setting the carbon price.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Better off, ah..... so does that mean they will be increasing their CO2 producing energy consumption?

Remember all consumer goods including food require CO2 producing energy to produce and transport.

Posted by Qlander, 13/04/2011 9:44:11 AM
Somehow I dont think there promises can be believed. One thing you can believe is the Labor party are Liers..
Posted by Loc Hey, 13/04/2011 9:59:24 AM
SHONK ALERT

If they are going to give it all back why take it in the first place? How do they pay for the bureaucratic processing?

Some one somewhere is going to be hurt.

Posted by daw, 13/04/2011 2:39:16 PM
So the "greatest moral challenge of our time" took stress leave until after the last election but has now come back as an obligation that does not apply to Labor voters.

Brilliant. So now the only people who will be out of pocket under the Carbon Tax will be the people who have enough money to ensure that the price increases will not be a deterent.

They won't respond to the price signal because it is small change compared to their incomes.

Meanwhile, everyone who would have been sensitive to a price signal will now be fully compensated and will not change their behaviour either.

So where does that leave us? Well, it looks like the same old ALP left "tax them and subsidise us" scam to me. Everything they touch turns to crap.

Posted by Ian Mott, 13/04/2011 3:33:14 PM
Electricity bills will increase again in regional NSW by a minimum of 17% (I'd go solar if I could afford to but the power bills are flogging me).

More increases after a carbon tax are to be expected but are not known at this stage.

All I hear from this deranged mob is "details to be released later" and "details not yet confirmed".

You cannot run a country with such vagueness - it's obvious this bunch are making it up as they go and are destroying business confidence.

Is it possible to call for an early election and get rid of these clowns while there are still a few of us left to vote?

Posted by Bluey, 13/04/2011 6:39:30 PM
By the way, I love how every article on carbon pollution is accompanied by photos of steam at Portland/Wallerawang power station (or similar).

It's enough to put a city dwelling environmental warrior off his lentils.

Posted by Bluey, 13/04/2011 7:20:32 PM
No matter how Labor rearranges this regressive tax it will still "bash the poorest the hardest" modern Labor's new slogan.

The carbon tax and ETS were both dreamt up by our elitist intellectual ponces to hurt everyone but themselves and accomplish nothing but to placate their own "carbon guilt".

Posted by what the, 13/04/2011 9:59:13 PM
What's wrong with more C02 anyway? It makes the grass grow better.

A tax on carbon is nothing but a FRAUD based on a LIE!

Posted by E J, 13/04/2011 11:29:44 PM
The carbon dioxide tax is designed to penalise anyone who produces anything any where in any industry, there being no alternative but to use man made machinery ,equipment and tools powered by fossil fuels, in a modern industrial economy.

How then is it possible for the government to even begin to compensate millions of households with revenues from the productive sector they have deliberately wrecked?

Posted by diesel head, 14/04/2011 12:59:36 AM
Just another bandaid applied by a lost party in the wilderness being led by a Green.

Carbon price will be tax deductible by the wealthy so Labor will have to raise Income Tax to pay for the cost of the Carbon Tax, Now that is Labour at it's best. How far away are these cliffs in the wilderness ??

Posted by Ray, 14/04/2011 10:26:58 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you believe that Australian farming land is currently undervalued?

Yes
(46.1%)

No
(40%)

Rural land prices are where they should be
(13.8%)

Total Votes: 427
Poll Date: 11 April, 2011



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...