News 
 Australian Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Peter Spencer ends his hunger strike 

Peter Spencer ends his hunger strike

13 Jan, 2010 12:43 PM
PETER Spencer has announced he is ending his hunger strike today and will be coming down from the wind tower on his property where he has been perched for the last 52 days in protest against erosion of property rights.

Buoyed by the fact that many farmers have vowed to join him with his fight for property rights recognition, he agreed to end his 52-day strike and go to hospital.

An emotional Mr Spencer this morning told 2GB radio that he had decided to end his hunger strike for the sake of his family and his deteriorating health.

Mr Spencer's doctors have advised him that he would soon do irreparable harm to his body if he continued with his strike.

Mr Spencer, 61, has survived on water, lemon juice, painkillers and vitamin tablets.

He has lived in a tent perched 10 metres up a wind monitoring tower on his Shannon Flat property near Cooma, NSW.

"As much as the nation is concerned about me, my concerns are directed at the families of the hundreds of farmers who have suicided and the politicians who have failed to show any concern, compassion or morality for what the government has done to these families and the nation's Constitution. My committed stance on the tower was to press the point," Mr Spencer said in a statement to the media this morning.

Mr Spencer has attracted national attention with his hunger strike, with landholders backing his protest against native vegetation legislation which has robbed them of the right to use much of their properties.

Mr Spencer has argued that since the Federal Government has been able to meet its Kyoto greenhouse emissions only due to the bans on land clearing, land holders should be compensated for the loss of their right to use their land.

Throughout his campaign he has called on Prime Minister Kevin Rudd to meet with him - a demand the Government rejected, saying they did not negotiate with people inflicting self harm for public attention.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Peters Spencer’s decision to come down from the wind speed tower after fifty two days is not a failure; his efforts become an indictment of the lack of honest effective political representation. I went to Saarahnlee last week to demonstrate my support. The trip down to Cooma confirmed my understanding that until we the voting population of Australia realise we have nothing to gain by continuing to support the two parties not much preferred we will continue to be treated with contempt by those politicians who control this country. We the peoples do have the power to shake the base of politics!
Posted by Edward James, 13/01/2010 12:45:58 PM
Thank you Peter for bringing this issue to the general public's attention. May your body recover quickily without any long-term effects. Unfortunately city folk have no concept what us farmers go through, so they can have their perfect food in their unsustainable lifestyles, while we continue to understand our environment as we interact with it everyday of our lifes. We need to continue the focus on the real issues facing farmers, rather than the continual rubbish that our goverment thinks (without evidence) is more important, so it can steal more money from the people who elected it. WHY IS OUR CONSITUTION NOT TAUGHT IN OUR SCHOOL, because a lot of todays laws are uncontitutional, and we can't have the people knowing their rights. Like what is REALLY in the Climate Change agreement...
Posted by We Will Fight, 13/01/2010 1:49:44 PM
Now the farmers are united by Peter's protest and the politicians should act, as a great injustice to the Australian farmer has gone on for too long. A plan of action should be drawn, as to which MP we should target with letters each week. A fighting fund account as the farmer needs a voice, as other nations have for their farmers that wouldn't let anyone take their rights without a fight. And another thing is bring back bounty's on feral dogs and foxes as that was working. (durrrr) United we fight, divided we get more rules and all farmers will be the whipping posts.
Posted by Tonytwotimbers, 13/01/2010 3:28:25 PM
Peter, thankyou for ceasing your strike. You succeeded and congratulations, you have brought the issue to a Nation! Now you can continue and I can assure you that whatever party supports you will have my vote.
Posted by the ringer, 14/01/2010 7:04:37 AM
Tony Abbott intends to attempt to overturn the Wild Rivers legislation in Qld because it denies aboriginal people in Cape York the right to earn a living from the land. If he is fair dinkem, he will go one step further and attempt to overturn the Vegetation Management legislation in Qld and NSW and any other State which has it because it denies the landowners regardless of race, the right to earn a living from the land. If he does not take this step, his move re Wild Rivers will be seen as a mere political stunt to gain the aboriginal vote. Let's hear something from you Tony Abbott; let's hear your support for the cause which Peter Spencer is fighting for.
Posted by green farmer, 14/01/2010 7:39:03 AM
Not all farmers are behind P. Spencer nor his methods. Many country folk I have spoken with see it as irresposnible and childish, the mainstream media also reported the past hsiortory of Mr Psencer and his financial woes. Many of the city folk see the farmers as a bunch of whingers where nothing ever goes right, they dont get their food from a farm they get it form a super market. Democracy will never work for the individual. Stop fighting the city folk, try and engage wiht them.
Posted by the lorax, 14/01/2010 9:33:47 AM
so farmers have been using the land for 200 odd years and making a living, so what is wrong with what you have, why do you need to clear more, why cant you make a living off what you have, why when river systems are under stress do farmers want the right to open up pristine rivers. What about the rights of the other 90% of Australians who like to keep pristine rivers and national parks. Don't forget who's taxes support your EC funding, where the universities and medical services are , where the tv shows are made and the steel is made. This blog preaches to the converted and you are quickly being marginalised as fanatics, such as P. Spencer. I am glad my PM did not succumb to the demands of one individual or group, he governs for Australia not just the country. Stop whingeing and get back to work.
Posted by the lorax, 14/01/2010 10:21:18 AM
Hey 'the lorax' words are cheap... where is the web site or system that you may have set up to 'engage the city folk'? Every farmer I know has relations in the city. It's the imports where your problem lies.... they have no idea of the Australian struggle and could care less... and this attitude is into the hallowed halls of beaurocrazy...where the rules are conceived and made. Be careful who you criticise in public forums. Have a look at how successful the French farmers are in their lobbying for rights..... and the Americans have their Bill of Rights. We relied on the British justice system to cover property rights..... and now it's all but gone. To be replaced by corporate muscle with no interest in your small business or farm, much less the landscape.
Posted by pepper, 14/01/2010 10:37:28 AM
The Lorex, that is precisely what Peter Spencer was trying to do: trying to raise awareness beyond the farmers who have been affected by land clearing laws, especially awareness in the cities. If the picture is painted wrongly then this is because of the decision of the media. Maybe there are farmers who are not behind Peter Spencer but I'll bet they are not farmers who have had their land use rights stolen from them over a substantial part of their property. Find me a farmer who has been seriously affected by vegetation management laws who does not support the cause Peter Spencer is fighting for and I'll find you a flying pig! And I'm not talking about restrictions which are for the good of the environment like leaving a riparian area near rivers and not destroying wetlands.
Posted by bushie, 14/01/2010 11:20:25 AM
Lorax, I bet you would winge like a stuck pig, if the RTA widened the road and moved your front fence back near your house then failed to pay you compensation. Get the burr out of your thong and look at the real issues.
Posted by jerangle, 14/01/2010 11:31:50 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Peter Spencer is ending his hunger strike.
Peter Spencer is ending his hunger strike.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
12 January, 2010
POLL
Q: Is it time for Peter Spencer to end his hunger strike against the erosion of property rights?

Yes - his point has been publicised
(53.9%)

No - not until Kevin Rudd meets him
(39%)

Undecided
(7.1%)

Total Votes: 336
Poll Date: 10 January, 2010



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...