News 
 Australian Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Why climate change and food security must not be separated 

Why climate change and food security must not be separated

16 Dec, 2009 08:29 AM
FARMERS and land managers will need to rethink the business model that they operate under to capitalise on the new opportunities on offer in climate change mitigation, the US Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack told farmers in Copenhagen this week.

At a special day dedicated to agriculture and its role in a new climate change deal, Secretary Vilsack said to capitalise on these opportunities farmers and land managers would need to develop new ways to partner with business and industries demanding greenhouse gas reductions.

He said climate change and global food security would be "among the most important and defining issues for our global community in the coming decades" and the two issues should not be separated.

"The drive to increase food production to keep up with global demand will have to occur in a system already under duress as a result of climate stress," Secretary Vilsack said.

"This increasing demand will have to be met within increasing water scarcity, heightened salinity, and more erratic weather and climate patterns.

"While climate change may affect all of us, there are particular vulnerabilities and challenges to our farmers, ranchers and those who make a living off the land."

But he said beyond the impact of the globe's food supply, and the livelihood of agricultural producers, agriculture must play a key role in mitigating climate change.

"Globally agriculture is responsible for 14 per cent of emissions, and deforestation's responsible for another 17 per cent of emissions," he said.

"It is difficult for me to see how greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere can be stabilised without actions to address emissions in carbon sequestration on agriculture and forest land.

"And frankly, as we look at the current research trajectory, we are not on a trajectory to help meet the challenges.

"We simply cannot afford to have increased emissions at the same time while food production fails to keep up with global demand.

"Our challenge today is to bring about a transformational change to mitigate and adapt to climate change."

Secretary Vilsack said to manage risk, farmers would need information about expected changes in climate on a scale that is useful to them.

"While global and regional climate change projections are important, they are not necessarily particularly helpful to a farmer who needs to know how this information translates at a local scale.

"We must remember however that research is not an end to itself, but rather better information is a tool and in a sense no different to a planter or a combine.

"The second area where we need scope, scale and impact is in the area of climate change adaption.

"We need to develop cropping and livestock systems that are resilient to climate change.

"We must take advantage of the world's vast gene banks to identify traits that can help curb resistance to drought and temperature extremes in crops and livestock.

"Finally we need to focus on climate change mitigation - agriculture stands to gain from new markets to reduce greenhouse gases and to increase carbon sequestration.

"There are a wide range of practices that exist to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase carbon sequestration, develop renewable energy sources, and improve energy efficiency on farms and forest lands.

"To fully realise the potential for land use mitigation for lands we will need to go beyond what we have done before and what is available now."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
More food from an already stressed system, in a climate that has already started to change for the worse and with no more forest to be cleared for new farming land, more water to be directed to the environment, belching animals to be removed as a food source! And some on the ground examples of new ways to do things are?
Posted by Rear View, 17/12/2009 8:31:28 AM
Try Carbon Grazing - Rear View
Posted by Better Ways, 17/12/2009 8:45:01 AM
please read my 3 eBooks on this issue targeted for the environmentally disinterested, and the ones who it really effects - our children. www.infinart.com.au Food is really the issue in climate change or as one great speaker put it: "If you eat you are involved."
Posted by smeedy, 17/12/2009 9:19:51 AM
There is nothing new about carbon grazing. In the 90s it was called improving biomass. In the 80s it was called improving soil structure. Before that I think it was just called good management.
Posted by Qlander, 17/12/2009 11:47:12 AM
Nice to see a senior public official telling it like it is, not side-stepping the need for mitigation in agriculture and encouraging people to look for new opportunities. Considering how many farm leaders are still in denial, this is brave stuff.
Posted by Michael, 17/12/2009 11:52:09 AM
Actually, farming is negative emissions. Growing crops takes farm more CO2 out of the atmosphere than is produced by farming activities. It is when the crops are consumed that the CO2 is released again. Therefore, the consumers of the crops should pay the carbon taxes not the farmers.
Posted by terry, 17/12/2009 4:59:10 PM
Why does his language sound like a euphemism for farmers to absorb more costs so city people can enjoy more luxuries by spending less on food and more on indulgences.
Posted by denis, 18/12/2009 2:25:31 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
US Secretary of the US Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack.
US Secretary of the US Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
15 December, 2009
14 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Has your farm business made a profit in 2009?

Yes - profit
(19.8%)

No - loss
(59.3%)

Broke even
(20.9%)

Total Votes: 450
Poll Date: 13 December, 2009
BLOGS
14 December, 2009



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...