News 
 Australian Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Glyphosate: friend or foe? 

Glyphosate: friend or foe?

05 Sep, 2011 06:00 AM
Glyphosate, the chemical underpinning the world's most productive farming systems, may becoming an agent of harm, a visiting US scientist believes.

"Glyphosate has been a very powerful tool for us in weed control, but it's been seriously abused by continued overuse," said veteran American plant pathologist, Dr Don Huber.

"I feel that's one of the main reasons that we're seeing a lot of other factors come to threaten the sustainability of our production."

Dr Huber links glyphosate to the increasing severity of diseases like fusarium and take-all, and the explosion of Goss's wilt of corn and Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS) in soybeans in America's mid-west.

Now retired from his career as a plant pathologist at Purdue University, but retaining the title of Professor Emeritus, Dr Huber is in Australia to air those concerns at the invitation of Owen McCarron, director of the IPM Masterclass series.

If it is allowed to accumulate in the soil, glyphosate doesn't just kill weeds, Dr Huber told Rural Press.

The chemical is a strong chelator, meaning that it can bind positively-charged mineral ions in the soil to its own molecules, making the mineral unavailable to plants. It is known to have an affinity for copper, zinc, manganese and molybedenum, among others.

"Glyphosate can make a number of elements unavailable for the plant to use, so there are many of the physiological functions of the plant that are compromised," Dr Huber said

"In that compromise period that plant becomes very susceptible to diseases, fungal diseases especially."

Glyphosate also affects important soil organisms in different ways, according to Dr Bob Kremer, a microbiologist with the USDA's Agricultural Research Service and adjunct professor at the University of Missouri.

In the soil, where it is carried by spray, rainfall or plant roots, the chemical is an energy source for some microbes - including those responsible for its degradation in the soil - but a killer of others.

Among the organisms that flourish in the presence of glyphosate appear to be certain strains of fusarium, which in European studies were shown to multiply in the presence of the compound, Dr Kremer told Rural Press.

That appears to line up with old Canadian research which found that wheat sown in fields that had been fallowed with glyphosate was more susceptible to fusarium head blight than control wheat plantings.

"(The researchers) hypothesised as the susceptible weeds died, it built up the fusarium populations and then when the wheat was planted later, there was a higher instance of fusarium head blight compared to fields that did not receive glyphosate treatment," Dr Kremer said.

Other organisms are suppressed by glyphosate, including the rhizobium bacteria reponsible for nodulation in legumes and the the algaes that are an important soil glue.

But Dr Kremer said the research needed to clarify these effects isn't being done. When he wants to interpret some of his own observations, he often has to look at research done decades ago.

And yet, he acknowledged, some of these processes, and glyphosate's chelation effect, have the potential to be highly damaging to crop profitability.

Dr Huber became interested in glyphosate when, after a long career in plant pathology, he and his colleagues saw crop diseases that had been adequately managed for decades suddenly burgeon out of control.

Goss's wilt of corn, for instance, was first discovered in the US in 1969, but only in the past few seasons it has emerged as a major pest of the Mid-West corn belt.

Dr Huber believes that genetic modification for glyphosate resistance contributes to disease vulnerability.

"Just the presence of the glyphosate resistance gene reduces the efficiency of the plant for many of the micronutrients - like manganese, iron - up to 30 or as much as 70 per cent, depending on the original variety," he said.

"When glyphosate is applied there will be an additional reduction in uptake and efficiency of micronutrients that are immobilised by the chemistry."

He is calling for "much more prudent use, and certainly much greater research to establish glyphosate's safety".

"There are a lot of indicators that it's not nearly as benign a product as we thought. With the growing residues that we're finding in our soils and crops and feedstocks, there's a very serious concern for the health and safety aspects of the products."

* Dr Huber will be talking in Bendigo, Vic. on September 5 and Corowa, NSW, on September 7. For more information call Oen McCarron on 0419 006 100 or email owen@ipmmasterclass.com

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"Dr Huber believes that genetic modification for glyphosate resistance contributes to disease vulnerability."

GM - was, is and always will be a failure.

"Glyphosate has been a very powerful tool for us in weed control, but it's been seriously abused by continued overuse,"

Monsanto should be thrilled with the sales.

Posted by Bagheera, 5/09/2011 11:28:45 AM
There is also French research showing that human exposure to glyphosate has caused placenta problems. Another reason to consider glyphosate your foe.
Posted by holisticmatt, 5/09/2011 11:32:16 AM
In respone to the previous comments, GM plant developments is not a failure and considering this scenario is scare-mongering, again. Be informed before making generalised statements on complex issues.

Placenta problems from Glyphosate use? Haven't heard of this but if true, responsible and best practice use should be looked at before throwing the book at Glyphosate chemistry.

Posted by RB Auckland, 5/09/2011 11:41:22 AM
I hope agriculture in general takes note of what is being said, I think it is very valid and logical. You can bet the agri giant chem companies will counterattack with misleading "research" (funded by them)
Posted by tanga, 5/09/2011 11:51:41 AM
That would have been the so-called research that fed rats the equivalent of a human drinking litre of pure Glyphosphate, Holisticmuck. And even then it was only a 50% mortality rate.

Notice how the Prof used vague terms like "up to 30% and even 70%" to describe particular extreme readings but was very short on broad, credible, statistical data?

And as usual for the shockerati, there was no mention of the kind of extreme mis-use that produced those results.

Use as directed in a standard crop/pasture rotational system and Glyphosphate remains an unambiguous friend.

Posted by Ian Mott, 5/09/2011 3:26:33 PM
Yes he is pobably no longer a 'Professor' after that little burst of nonsense.
Posted by the future, 5/09/2011 5:19:06 PM
It is astonishing how Mott manages to miss the point, again and again and again.

Before sounding off about how Prof Huber is vague and short on detail (in a short piece by journalist Matt Cawood!), Mott could read Huber's detailed paper Glyphosate effects on diseases of plants, Johal and Huber, European Journal of Agronomy (Elsevier 2009), and pay some attention to the several pages of research references.


Posted by nico, 5/09/2011 5:33:14 PM
Valid and reasonable does not mean accurate and reproducable by others trying to replicate a stated result.

I sat thru a one day lecture from Doc Huber and had the bejeezus scared from me. I then went away and tried to find enough scientific evidence to back up the least unusual of the Doc's claims, found very little, and slept well.

By the end of the lecture GMO's in general and Roundup in particular were being blamed for massive livestock losses, new to science disease organisms and human obesity.

Matthew has given us the relatively believable start of the Doc's "hell on earth" vision.

Posted by suno, 5/09/2011 5:44:02 PM
A recent and independent study by Gilles-Eric Seralini at Caen University, France confirms that GM feed is toxic and Round-up is at the centre of the toxicity. The toxicity includes liver and kidney affects that are statistically significant.

Industry at large, including farmers have a duty of care to not submit people world-wide to this toxicity.

Clearly, many farmers do not want to hear these facts and are in denial.

However, we should remember the effects of Agent Orange and the impact (eg. cancer) that it can carry through generations.


Posted by mangiri, 6/09/2011 10:22:17 AM
Huber has been discredited by Purdue - http://www.btny.purdue.edu/weedscience/2011/glyphosatesimpact11.pdf and he couldn't provide the proof he promised in the US (http://www.capitalpress.com/idaho/se-Roundup-claims-072211)

so he goes to Australia to spread his misinformation...after all -the further you are from home the more of an expert you are..

Posted by Indiana Family Farmer, 6/09/2011 12:06:50 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you think the Convoy of No Confidence achieved its goal?

Yes
(37.7%)

No
(50.9%)

Unsure
(11.4%)

Total Votes: 709
Poll Date: 29 August, 2011



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...