News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Cellulosic ethanol slashes emissions 

Cellulosic ethanol slashes emissions

22 Jun, 2010 02:00 PM
ETHANOL produced by Project Liberty, US biofuel company Poet's first planned commercial cellulosic ethanol plant, will reduce carbon emissions by 111 per cent over gasoline, an independent lifecycle analysis shows.

The analysis, compiled in the US by Air Improvement Resource, Inc. out of Novi, Mich., highlighted a number of characteristics of Poet’s process that led to this large emissions reduction.

Specifically, Project Liberty produced ethanol from agricultural waste.

Because it uses a waste product from an existing crop, there were no additional inputs for planting and growing the feedstock.

Although often disputed, the theory of indirect land use change has not impacted on the cellulosic ethanol.

In addition, the waste stream from Poet’s process was fed into two anaerobic digesters to create biogas.

Enough biogas is produced to completely power both Project Liberty and the adjacent grain-based ethanol plant.

The natural gas that is displaced in this process is credited to the cellulosic ethanol plant.

“The production of biogas as a co-product is an exciting aspect of this process,” POET chief executive Jeff Broin said.

“We will use renewable energy to produce renewable energy.”

The analysis found all the inputs into Project Liberty would emit 41.8 grams of carbon dioxide equivalent units per megajoule of energy produced.

The biogas exported as a co-product will offset 49.8 gCO2eq/MJ.

EPA estimates for land use and agriculture changes offset an additional 1.7 gCO2eq/MJ, bringing Project Liberty's total emissions to -9.7 gCO2eq/MJ.

EPA’s standard for gasoline emissions is 92.9 gCO2eq/MJ.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
There is no such thing as waste product from an existing crop.
Posted by Dave, 23/06/2010 8:35:21 AM
We are still driving combustion engine cars we should move on from there to Hydrogen cells and batteries even compressed air but is it a strong start so they should keep experimenting. My answer is magnetics after all the earth spins so get your vehicle to stop spining and then you will be travelling!
Posted by Jon Noble, 23/06/2010 10:57:45 AM
Fascinating statistic that - "reduce carbon emissions by 111%" over gasoline". Could a competent scientist/matematician please explain the logic behind the statistic to this obviously-incompetent scientist and engineer.
Posted by AJ, 23/06/2010 11:22:09 AM
Magnetics sounds great, as long as you only want to travel east to west!
Posted by Janus, 23/06/2010 11:31:39 AM
Spot-on AJ. How can we take any notice of someone who is going to reduce emissions by 111%? The only way that could happen is if this technology would produce no carbon dioxide, and at the same time consume extra carbon dioxide.
Posted by Barney, 23/06/2010 11:36:04 AM
AJ: I guess they claim that the process has a net carbon sequestration of 11%, over cancelling out all C emissions compared to gasoline. Creative accounting with not attributing any carbon cost to the production of the "waste" product used, and not considering the agronomic opportunity cost of the "waste" product tends to help in achieving such figures.
Posted by morrgo, 23/06/2010 1:18:24 PM
Don't be so quick to judge AJ. Read the article. -9.7 is about 111% less than 92.9. Figured that out with Y12 maths from 32 yrs ago.
Posted by My Kids Matter, 23/06/2010 1:18:38 PM
There would be far more gains to be made by moving to new design engines, than by trimming the edges of ethanol production techniques. Ethanol is always barely able to compete with oil, and will never be able to provide the quantities required. However, a 10 or even 20% gain in engine efficiency by moving to new engine designs, will make an enormous difference. The engine manufacturers continuously and strenuously resist, any attempt to move to better engine technology. There are new crankshaft designs (Revetec engine), new head designs (Coates Spherical Rotary Valve), and new materials technologies, that could easily see gains of 20% in efficiency, if manufacturers abandoned the current, obsolete, engine design principles, and incorporated all these new and sound designs into new lines of powerplants.
Posted by Ron N, 6/07/2010 1:15:44 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
21 June, 2010
POLL
Q: Are you concerned about the increasing amount of foreign investment in our agricultural resources?

Yes
(82.2%)

No
(17.8%)

Total Votes: 702
Poll Date: 20 June, 2010

Most popular articles



Straight Furrow







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...