News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Wall St Journal rebukes NZ's climate variation response 

Wall St Journal rebukes NZ's climate variation response

11 Sep, 2009 03:06 PM
A Wall Street Journal opinion piece has delivered a stinging rebuke of New Zealand’s climate variation response, describing as ‘lunacy’, the Government’s wish to drive down living standards in order to protect the country’s perceived image abroad.

“For far too long New Zealand has delivered a policy response built upon what we think others think of us, as opposed to what they actually do think of us,” says Don Nicolson, Federated Farmers President.

“I hope the tone of the Wall Street Journal may jolt the Government out of its myopic obsession with the 0.2 percent of global emissions we produce. Climate variation isn’t something New Zealand can lead upon, as we are a flea in the global scheme of things.

“In the case of an international climate variation response, New Zealand needs to be a follower and not a leader. While we must play our part, it’s an issue that only the big emitters can seriously address and provide leadership upon, as only they can set the international framework.

“So where the bloody hell is the United States, the European Union, China, Canada, India and Australia?

“New Zealand farmers would be happy to be treated the same as farmers in the United States and the European Union. But instead we are the only country on the planet to include all agricultural sectors and gasses in our climate variation response.

“I’m tired of armchair exporters telling us what our brand is when they export absolutely nothing. Our brand is built upon safe, wholesome and nutritious food and not a slogan.

“The Wall Street Journal rightly points out that no one here really knows what the real cost of implementing these policies will be on the average family. Any household impact figure is worth about as much as the paper it’s written on.

“Where’s the detailed policy on how a 34-44 percent reduction will be rung from electricity, fuel, building materials, food, clothing, electronics and services?

“The Wall Street Journal has a different slant on what our ‘brand’ ought to be and that’s ‘focusing on encouraging strong economic growth to support a vibrant, entrepreneurial society. That way, tourists may want to come to New Zealand and stay’. Amen to that.

“Federated Farmers solution is to take a practical approach and invest in research and mitigation expertise, which is already happening. As a country, we need to plant significant numbers of trees, invest in water storage and keep agriculture out of the ETS so we can still earn some export dollars to pay our increasing bills,” Mr Nicolson concluded.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I agree with mr. Nicholson's comments. He needs to talk to the Wanganui Fed Farmers, Mr. Doughty, who is making rediculous statements in the press that farmers need to embrace the NZ. emt scheme. I wonder how he got his job. I also agree with the Wall Steet Journal article.
Posted by Paul, 25/09/2009 9:31:54 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles



Straight Furrow







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...